Aspiration during anaesthesia in the first 4000 incidents reported to webAIRS

23Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The first 4000 reports to the webAIRS anaesthesia incident reporting database were used to evaluate pulmonary aspiration in patients undergoing procedures under general anaesthesia or sedation. Demographic data, predisposing factors, outcome and potential preventative measures were evaluated. In these reports, 121 cases of aspiration were identified. Aspirated substances included gastric contents, bile type fluids, blood and solids; 60 (49.6%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit/high dependency unit, and 43 (35.5%) required mechanical ventilation. Aspiration was associated with significant harm in >50% of reports, and eight (6.6%) patients died. Factors associated with a risk ratio of aspiration >1.5 and outside the 95% confidence interval for no event included: age >80 years, emergency procedure, procedure undertaken in freestanding day unit or gastroenterology department, procedure undertaken between 1800 and 2200 hours and endoscopy procedures. Only 11 (9%) cases appeared to be inadequately fasted, and 77 (64%) were definitely fasted. In the remaining 33 (27%), fasting was not mentioned. In 18 (14.9%) cases, aspiration occurred in the presence of cricoid pressure. Potential measures to prevent aspiration included using a cuffed endotracheal tube rather than a laryngeal mask airway in cases at high risk of aspiration and being made more aware of potential risk factors by improvements in team communication. Aspiration continues to be an important complication of anaesthesia, and one that can be difficult to predict and to prevent.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kluger, M. T., Culwick, M. D., Moore, M. R., & Merry, A. F. (2019). Aspiration during anaesthesia in the first 4000 incidents reported to webAIRS. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 47(5), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X19854456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free