Two-year recurrence after first-ever stroke in a general population of 1.4 million Japanese patients ― the Shiga Stroke and Heart Attack Registry study ―

10Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Despite many effective strategies for the prevention of recurrent stroke, individuals who survive an initial stroke have been shown to be at high risk of recurrent stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of stroke recurrence after first-ever stroke using a population-based stroke registry in Japan. Methods and Results: As part of the Shiga Stroke and Heart Attack Registry, the Shiga Stroke Registry is an ongoing population-based stroke registry study that covers approximately 1.4 million residents of Shiga Prefecture, Japan. A total of 1,883 first-ever stroke survivors at 28 days was registered in 2011 and followed-up until the end of 2013. Recurrence was defined as any type of stroke after 28 days from the onset of an index event. Two-year cumulative recurrence rates were estimated using cumulative incidence function methods. Over a mean 2.1-year follow-up period, 120 patients experienced recurrent stroke and 389 patients died without recurrence. The 2-year cumulative recurrence rate was higher in patients with index ischemic stroke (6.8%) than in those with index hemorrhagic stroke (3.8%). Conclusions: Two-year cumulative recurrence rate after first-ever stroke remained high, particularly among patients with ischemic stroke, in the present population-based registry study in a real-world setting in Japan. Further intensive secondary prevention strategies are required for these high-risk individuals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takashima, N., Arima, H., Kita, Y., Fujii, T., Tanaka-Mizuno, S., Shitara, S., … Nozaki, K. (2020). Two-year recurrence after first-ever stroke in a general population of 1.4 million Japanese patients ― the Shiga Stroke and Heart Attack Registry study ―. Circulation Journal, 84(6), 943–948. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free