Is the dorsal percutaneous approach well-founded for osteosynthesis of scaphoid fractures?

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: To compare complications associated with dorsal percutaneous and limited dorsal approaches in the surgical treatment of fractured scaphoid bone. Methods: A total of 51 patients with acute type A2, B2 and B3 scaphoid fractures were treated by limited dorsal approach. During follow-up examinations we analysed the functional outcome and per-and post-operative complications, and we compared them with studies using the dorsal percutaneous approach. Results: We found fewer complications using the limited dorsal approach. Conclusions: We found no advantages of the dorsal percutaneous approach. In addition to a favourable functional outcome, the limited dorsal approach permits visualization of the screw insertion point and of the fracture line course, and prevents insufficient screw sinking underneath the bone cartilage and malunion.© P. Drac, I. Cizmar, J. Hrbek.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drac, P., Cizmar, I., & Hrbek, J. (2009). Is the dorsal percutaneous approach well-founded for osteosynthesis of scaphoid fractures? Biomedical Papers, 153(3), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2009.039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free