Decontamination of instruments and control of cross infection in general practice

18Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of decontamination procedures in general practice. Anonymous postal questionnaire survey of 600 general practitioners randomly selected from the national register. 382 General practitioners, a response rate of 65%. 186 General practitioners had autoclaves but 125 used hot water disinfectors or chemical disinfectants to reprocess instruments. 22% (474/2132) Of high risk instruments were inadequately decontaminated. Decontamination was performed by the practice nurse or receptionist in 306 practices. Knowledge of treatment of spillages of blood fluids was uncertain, and only 114 general practitioners used effective methods for dealing with spillages. A comprehensive central code of practice for control of infection is needed for primary health care staff.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morgan, D. R., Lamont, T. J., Dawson, J. D., & Booth, C. (1990). Decontamination of instruments and control of cross infection in general practice. British Medical Journal, 300(6736), 1379–1380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1379

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free