Analysis, Philosophy and the Challenge of Critical Theory: Michael Spitzer’s Music as Philosophy: Adorno and Beethoven’s Late Style

  • Horton J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Michael Spitzer’s Music as Philosophy: Adorno and Beethoven’s Late Style (Indiana University Press, 2006, ISBN 0-253-34724-6) pursues multiple lines of scholarly enquiry. As a musicological study, the book advances an historicist agenda, which grounds the understanding of Beethoven’s music in an extension of its contemporaneous philosophical context. As a music-analytical study, it proposes an approach based on fluid philosophical and style-historical categories, and so opposes the quasi-scientific, theory-heavy strategies that increasingly dominate transatlantic music analysis. As a template for current scholarly practice, Music as Philosophy fights a rearguard action against the postmodern opprobrium that Adorno and his descendents have recently endured. This review article evaluates Spitzer’s study against the background of recent critical engagements with Adorno’s legacy, especially that advanced by Richard Taruskin, estimating the analytical efficacy of Spitzer’s Adornian apparatus, and appraising the defence of critical theory it mounts, in view of the postmodern hostility such modes of thought have of late provoked.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horton, J. (2007). Analysis, Philosophy and the Challenge of Critical Theory: Michael Spitzer’s Music as Philosophy: Adorno and Beethoven’s Late Style. Journal of the Society for Musicology in Ireland, 63–95. https://doi.org/10.35561/jsmi03075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free