Syndromic surveillance for emerging infections in office practice using billing data

16Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to evaluate the feasibility of conducting syndromic surveillance in a primary care office using billing data. METHODS: A 1-year study was conducted in a primary care practice; comparison data were obtained from emergency department records of visits by county residents. Within the practice, a computer program converted billing data into deidentifi ed daily summaries of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes by sex and age-group; and a staff member generated daily summaries and e-mailed them to the analysis team. For both the practice and the emergency departments, infection-related syndromes and practice-specific thresholds were calculated using the category 1 syndrome codes and an analyitical method based upon the Early Aberration Reporting System of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RESULTS: A mean of 253 ICD-9 codes per day was reported. The most frequently recorded syndromes were respiratory illness, gastrointestinal illness, and fever. Syndromes most commonly exceeding the threshold of 2 standard deviations for the practice were lymphadenitis, rash, and fever. Generating a daily summary took 1 to 2 minutes; the program was written by the software vendor for a fee of $1,500. During the 2003-2004 influenza season, trend line patterns of the emergency department visits reflected a pattern consistent with that of the state, whereas the trend line in primary case practice cases was less consistent, reflecting the variation expected in data from a single clinic. Still, spikes of activity that occurred in the practice before the emergency department suggest the practice may have seen patients with influenza earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study showed the feasibility of implementing syndromic surveillance in an office setting at a low cost and with minimal staff effort. Although many implementation issues remain, further development of syndromic surveillance systems should include primary care offices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sloane, P. D., MacFarquhar, J. K., Sickbert-Bennett, E., Mitchell, C. M., Akers, R., Weber, D. J., & Howard, K. (2006). Syndromic surveillance for emerging infections in office practice using billing data. Annals of Family Medicine, 4(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free