Impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels

23Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM10, PM4, PM2.5, PM1 ) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS®, GLO®, JUUL®, with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM1 size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM1 concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM1 concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL® —depending on the pod used—to considerably severe for IQOS® and GLO® . Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 µg m−3 (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS® and GLO® indoor PM1 concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 µg m−3, especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Protano, C., Manigrasso, M., Cammalleri, V., Zoccai, G. B., Frati, G., Avino, P., & Vitali, M. (2020). Impact of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes on indoor air particular matter levels. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free