Comparison of geometrical accuracy of a component manufactured using additive and conventional methods

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter describes three different methods of manufacturing a vacuum cleaner connector made of ABS and NECURON plastic material. Basically, the part is produced on an injection molding machine; however, with the help of manual laser scanner analysis, it is possible to compare two other methods: part manufactured by milling is 0.04, mm and part manufactured by injection molding machine is −0.15, mm and 3D-printed part is −0.20, mm. All the above-mentioned methods of producing the connector have their advantages and disadvantages. The fabrication time of all elements (under 1, min for injection molding machine, 1.5, h for milling machine and ca. 7, h for 3D printing) and costs of machines and tooling are decisive factors for manufacturing technique selection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habrat, W., Zak, M., Krolczyk, J., & Turek, P. (2018). Comparison of geometrical accuracy of a component manufactured using additive and conventional methods. In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (Vol. 0, pp. 765–776). Springer Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_74

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free