Diverged preferences towards sustainable development goals? A comparison between academia and the communication industry

5Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To understand how the sustainable development goals (SDGs) are involved and cited in different fields, the current study aimed to explore the key SDGs and SDG-pairs from the viewpoints of academia and the media. The academic publications with SDG(s)-related keywords in the Scopus database and the entry videos of the “2018 SDG Lions” were collected and analyzed through content and network analysis. It was found that SDG 3 and SDG 10 shared the highest preferences in both industries, but apparent gaps happened to SDG 5. The tied frequencies of the possible SDG pairs were also examined, and SDG 3-10 was identified taking the lead in both industries. Network analysis using degree centrality as the vital parameter demonstrated that SDG 8 and SDG 5 has strong connections with several SDGs for the academia and the media, respectively. The SDG-2-6-7 combination or “water-energy-food” nexus was also found the most frequent combination of three SDGs in the academia. Overall, SDG 3 can be treated as a unifying theme when seeking to acquire evidence-based knowledge for integrated implementation of the SDGs. Important implications for policy-making of the SDGs were also discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yeh, S. C., Chiou, H. J., Wu, A. W., Lee, H. C., & Wu, H. C. (2019, November 2). Diverged preferences towards sustainable development goals? A comparison between academia and the communication industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224577

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free