What’s fair is fair: Leveling the playing field for young scientists

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Like every MD Ph.D. pup, I was faced with the BIG decision: medicine or science? It was easy to choose. As I saw it, in the clinic you were expected to do as told and methodically follow a well-trodden career path that tolerated little deviation. In the lab, you were expected to think for yourself and create a career based on your ability to generate new knowledge. Typically, you could start your own group as a principal investigator (PI) after just a few years (sometimes even zero) as a post-doc, and the NIH R01 funding success rate was much higher than it is now (30+% vs. less than 20%). This looked pretty good to my young self. Prizing my independence and placing a high value on creativity, I went straight to the lab. I do not remember having second thoughts or even a backup plan. I don't think my situation was that unusual. Opportunities abounded for well-trained, ambitious young scientists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yewdell, J. W. (2018, June 1). What’s fair is fair: Leveling the playing field for young scientists. Vaccines. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6020033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free