Faktor Determinasi Kualitas Audit: Pada Perusahaan BUMN di Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019

  • Anggina F
  • Cheisviyanny C
  • Septiari D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of audit quality determination factors which consist of restatement, small profit, prior roa meet, going concern opinion and type 1 error going concern opinion on audit quality. This research was conducted on BUMN companies in Indonesia in 2015-2019 and the research sample was determined using the purposive sampling method so that 46 sample companies were obtained. The results show that companies that do restatement do not have a worse audit quality than those that do not restate, companies that are categorized as small profit do not have audit quality that are worse than those that are not categorized as small profit, companies that are categorized as prior-roa meet do not have audit quality that is worse than those who are not categorized as prior roa meet, auditors who provide going concern opinions do not have better audit quality than those who do not provide going concern opinions and auditors who make type 1 errors going concern opinions do not have worse audit quality than those who do not commits a type 1 error of going-concern opinion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anggina, F. M., Cheisviyanny, C., & Septiari, D. (2021). Faktor Determinasi Kualitas Audit: Pada Perusahaan BUMN di Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019. JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI, 3(3), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v3i3.440

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free