Prognostic factors and predictive model in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy

58Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (BTA) has been a rare but fatal cancer. If unresectable, palliative chemotherapy improved the quality and length of life, but to the authors' knowledge, prognostic factors in such patients have not been well established to date. In the current study, prognostic factors were investigated in patients with advanced BTA receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy. METHODS: Data from 213 patients with advanced BTA who were in prospective phase 2 or retrospective studies from September 2000 through October 2007 were used. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 29.7 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.3 months-8.3 months). A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that metastatic disease (hazards ratio [HR], 1.521; P = .011), intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (HR, 1.368; P = .045), liver metastasis (HR, 1.845; P < .001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR, 1.707; P 1.5 but ≥ 2.2; n = 75), and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.9 months-4.1 months) for the high-risk group (PI > 2.2; n = 70 [P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS: Five prognostic factors in patients with advanced BTA were identified. The predictive model based on PI appears to be promising and may be used for the management of individual patients and to guide the design of future clinical trials, although external validation is needed. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, I., Lee, J. L., Ryu, M. H., Kim, T. W., Sung, S. L., Do, H. P., … Kim, M. H. (2009). Prognostic factors and predictive model in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy. Cancer, 115(18), 4148–4155. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24472

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free