The anatomy of the joint as a risk factor for Lisfranc dislocation and fracture-dislocation: An anatomical and radiological case control study

  • Peicha G
  • Labovitz J
  • Seibert F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

he anatomy of the mortise of the Lisfranc joint between the medial and lateral cuneiforms was studied in detail, with particular reference to features which may predispose to injury. In 33 consecutive patients with Lisfranc injuries we measured, from conventional radiographs, the medial depth of the mortise (A), the lateral depth (B) and the length of the second metatarsal (C). MRI was used to confirm the diagnosis. We calculated the mean depth of the mortise (A+B)/2, and the variables of the lever arm as follows: C/A, C/B and C/mean depth. The data were compared with those obtained in 84 cadaver feet with no previous injury of the Lisfranc joint complex. Statistical analysis used Student's two-sample t-test at the 5% error level and forward stepwise logistic regression. The mean medial depth of the mortise was found to be significantly less in patients with Lisfranc injuries than in the control group. Stepwise logistic regression identified only this depth as a significant risk factor for Lisfranc injuries. The odds of being in the injury group is 0.52 (approximately half) that of being a control if the medial depth of the mortise is increased by 1 mm, after adjusting for the other variables in the model. Our findings show that the mortise in patients with injuries to the Lisfranc joint is shallower than in the control group and the shallower it is the greater is the risk of injury.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peicha, G., Labovitz, J., Seibert, F. J., Grechenig, W., Weiglein, A., Preidler, K. W., & Quehenberger, F. (2002). The anatomy of the joint as a risk factor for Lisfranc dislocation and fracture-dislocation: An anatomical and radiological case control study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 84(7), 981–985. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b7.12587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free