A pro-con debate: Current controversies in pah pathogenesis at the american thoracic society international conference in 2017

13Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The following review summarizes the pro-con debate about current controversies regarding the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that took place at the American Thoracic Society Conference in May 2017. Leaders in the field of PAH research discussed the importance of the immune system, the role of hemodynamic stress and endothelial apoptosis, as well as bone morphogenetic protein receptor-2 signaling in PAH pathogenesis. Whereas this summary does not intend to resolve obvious conflicts in opinion, we hope that the presented arguments entice further discussions and draw a new generation of enthusiastic researchers into this vibrant field of science to bridge existing gaps for a better understanding and therapy of this fatal disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuebler, W. M., Nicolls, M. R., Olschewski, A., Abe, K., Rabinovitch, M., Stewart, D., … Spiekerkoetter, E. (2018, October 1). A pro-con debate: Current controversies in pah pathogenesis at the american thoracic society international conference in 2017. American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. American Physiological Society. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00150.2018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free