Analysis of false-negative human immunodeficiency virus rapid tests performed on oral fluid in 3 international clinical research studies

21Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. The OraQuick Advance Rapid HIV-1/2 Test is a point-of-care test capable of detecting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific antibodies in blood and oral fluid. To understand test performance and factors contributing to false-negative results in longitudinal studies, we examined results of participants enrolled in the Botswana TDF/FTC Oral HIV Prophylaxis Trial, the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, and the Bangkok MSM Cohort Study, 3 separate clinical studies of high-risk, HIV-negative persons conducted in Botswana and Thailand. Methods. In a retrospective observational analysis, we compared oral fluid OraQuick (OFOQ) results among participants becoming HIV infected to results obtained retrospectively using enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests on stored specimens. We categorized negative OFOQ results as true-negative or false-negative relative to nucleic acid amplification test and/or enzyme immunoassay, and determined the delay in OFOQ conversion relative to the estimated time of infection. We used log-binomial regression and generalized estimating equations to examine the association between false-negative results and participant, clinical, and testing-site factors. Results. Two-hundred thirty-three false-negative OFOQ results occurred in 80 of 287 seroconverting individuals. Estimated OFOQ conversion delay ranged from 14.5 to 547.5 (median, 98.5) days. Delayed OFOQ conversion was associated with clinical site and test operator (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Curlin, M. E., Gvetadze, R., Leelawiwat, W., Martin, M., Rose, C., Niska, R. W., … Mcnicholl, J. M. (2017). Analysis of false-negative human immunodeficiency virus rapid tests performed on oral fluid in 3 international clinical research studies. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 64(12), 1663–1669. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free