Using qualitative data from a program director's evaluation form as an outcome measurement for medical school

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Medical education programs need outcome measurements to promote curriculum improvement and to help meet accreditation standards. Purpose: Determine the added value of qualitative comments written by program directors (PDs) in response to a survey concerning fi rst postgraduate year (PGY-1) graduates. We hypothesized that these comments would serve as an additional outcome measurement for our graduates, adding information not readily captured in numeric data. Methods: PD evaluation form surveys from 1993-2002. All qualitative comments offered in response to free text questions were coded and compared with numeric ratings. Results: A total of 1,247 surveys were included (80% response rate). Comments about specifi c graduates were coded as positive, negative, or neutral and were categorized into themes. Inter-rater reliability was high ( κ = 0.82). Compared with 4% of graduates who received one or more numeric ratings of less than satisfactory, 7% had one or more qualitative phrases classifi ed as negative. Conclusions: Qualitative comments can serve as a useful outcome measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Durning, S. J., Hanson, J., Gilliland, W., McManigle, J. M., Waechter, D., & Pangaro, L. N. (2010). Using qualitative data from a program director’s evaluation form as an outcome measurement for medical school. Military Medicine, 175(6), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-09-00044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free