Future Highly Efficient Engines with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Gas Turbine Coupling: System Modeling Study and Comparison of Directly and Indirectly Coupled SOFC–GT Systems

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study investigates hybridization of a solid oxide fuel cell with a gas turbine (SOFC–GT) for application in an ATR 72 regional aircraft. Several challenges hinder its viability, including the low gravimetric power density of SOFC stacks and stringent heat integration constraints. A steady-state model sweeps the cell voltage, overall pressure ratio (OPR), and a bounded turbine inlet temperature (TIT). This study introduces a new corrected power-share metric. This metric accounts for operating-point-dependent SOFC power density. It also enables weight-relevant comparisons. We analyze two types of coupling: direct and indirect. In the direct coupling, SOFC cooling fixes the core airflow and a TIT ceiling imposes a minimum power share. In the indirect coupling, a bypass decouples SOFC and gas turbine operation, incurring an efficiency penalty. We compare two heat-integration architectures: preheating with SOFC cathode exhaust versus low-pressure turbine (LPT) exhaust. Results show that direct coupling achieves efficiencies above 65% at high-corrected power shares, whereas indirect coupling offers greater operational flexibility but lower efficiency. Cathode exhaust preheating improves feasibility and outperforms LPT recuperation by more than 15% efficiency at low-to-mid-corrected power shares. However, LPT recuperation attains higher peak efficiency only at high-corrected power shares and within a narrow OPR window, which is limited by recuperator pinch.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Köhler, P., Hollmann, J., Taissir, A., Heddrich, M. P., & Kabelac, S. (2026). Future Highly Efficient Engines with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Gas Turbine Coupling: System Modeling Study and Comparison of Directly and Indirectly Coupled SOFC–GT Systems. Aerospace, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13030263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free