Abstract
Background: The presented method of evaluating computer tests is based on the requisite to reduce the risk of guessing the correct answers while testing a large number of Healthcare students. The system guides students to realize their own mistakes and deducts points for their mistakes made unconsciously. Aim: To compare the suitability of a method dealing with the certainty based marking tests in contrast to the tests without correction of guessing the correct answers while marking the knowledge of students of health studies. Methods: 150 students undertook a test evaluating their level of knowledge from anatomy which is taken on regular basis. This test had a form of 40 computer evaluated dichotomous tasks with the correction of guessing the correct answers with a degree of certainty. The results were recalculated for correction using a negative marking and for results without correction. Results: The average value of the difficulty of test items Q reached the level of 22.3. Yet corrected using the degree of certainty the outcome median was 49.2% of the required 70%. Without corrections the median was 77.5%. Conclusion: This evaluation using the degree of certainty seems to be too strict for the students, however if the students actually had the required knowledge, they would have been more successful. A great benefit compared to other correction mechanisms designed for guessing is greater stratification of the results according to the number of mistakes made unconsciously and guessed answers.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Blanař, V., & Pospíchal, J. (2016). I know that I know: A certainty based marking tests designed for evaluating knowledge of healthcare students. Profese Online, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5507/pol.2016.001
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.