The role of generative design and additive manufacturing capabilities in developing human–AI symbiosis: Evidence from multiple case studies

46Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The benefits of additive manufacturing (AM) extend beyond the attributes of physical products and production processes they enable. Experience with AM can augment the way design is approached and can increase opportunities to pivot toward less familiar design tasks. We begin this qualitative study with a natural experiment made possible by an exogenous shock: the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a three-stage case study approach using a grounded theory-building method, we contrast AM usage among a set of firms, half of which pivoted their resources away from their traditional production and toward a response to this shock. We engage in an abductive reasoning approach to consider common threads in AM capabilities that facilitated this pivoting. Our analyses suggest that the advanced use of generative design (GD), a category of computational technologies enabling novel and optimized design, is a critical attribute of these firms that ended up pivoting to make COVID-related products. Specifically, firms with experience applying this capability demonstrated a unique ability to pivot during this shock and emphasized their valuation of AM-enabled agility. We revisited these firms 2 years after initial contact and found that GD was associated with higher levels of innovation and was largely viewed by designers as a mechanism driving double-loop learning. Overall, our study provides insights into the symbiosis between human and artificially intelligent GD, and the role of such symbiosis in advancing AM capabilities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bendoly, E., Chandrasekaran, A., Lima, M. do R. F., Handfield, R., Khajavi, S. H., & Roscoe, S. (2024). The role of generative design and additive manufacturing capabilities in developing human–AI symbiosis: Evidence from multiple case studies. Decision Sciences, 55(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free