Comparison between The Effect of Sucralose and Sodium Saccharin on Some Physiological Parameters in Male Albino Rats

  • Helal E
  • Al-Shamrani A
  • Abdelaziz M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) are becoming popular as sugar substitutes for diabetic patients or to decrease body weight. Aim of the work: This study was aimed to determine the effects of sucralose and sodium saccharin on some physiological parameters in male albino rats. Materials and methods: We used thirty male albino rats weighing from 100 to120 gm. The period of the experiment was 30 days. The animals were divided into three groups; Group 1: control, Group 2: rats received sucralose and group 3: rats received sodium saccharin. The following parameters were processed: serum glucose, ASAT, ALAT, serum creatinine, serum urea, protein and lipid profiles and hormonal levels (insulin, testosterone, serum T3 and T4). Results: There was an increase in ASAT and ALAT activities, serum creatinine and serum urea levels in group 2 and group 3, lipid profile in the group received sucralose (TC, HDL and LDL) and T3&T4 in the group received saccharin as compared to the control group. Meanwhile, a drop in serum glucose, insulin, total protein, albumin, albumin/globulin ratio and triglycerides in group 2 and group 3, lipid profile in the group received saccharin (TC, HDL and LDL) and T3&T4 in the group received sucralose was observed when compared to the control group. Conclusion: it could be concluded that sucralose and sodium saccharin must be carefully used because they have very dangerous effects-especially sodium saccharin-and we have to replace them with natural sugar.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helal, E. G. E., Al-Shamrani, A., Abdelaziz, M. A., & El-Gamal, M. S. (2019). Comparison between The Effect of Sucralose and Sodium Saccharin on Some Physiological Parameters in Male Albino Rats. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 74(7), 1552–1558. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2019.28025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free