Sustained low-efficiency dialysis for renal replacement therapy in the ICU: a cost-benefit analysis of the years 2006 to 2010

  • Neuenfeldt T
  • Hopf H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) as primary renal replacement therapy in acute renal failure is still not widely used compared to continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), despite possible economical advantages. Based on one key paper [1] we use SLED as primary renal replacement therapy. However, since medical and economical data with SLED are scarce, we evaluated costs and outcome in a 5-year retrospective study on our ICU.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neuenfeldt, T., & Hopf, H. (2012). Sustained low-efficiency dialysis for renal replacement therapy in the ICU: a cost-benefit analysis of the years 2006 to 2010. Critical Care, 16(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10976

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free