A model to explain suicide by self-immolation among Iranian women: A grounded theory study

42Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction Self-immolation is a common method of suicide among Iranian women. There are several contributing motives for attempting self-immolation, and exploration of the process of self-immolation incidents will help interventionists and clinicians develop prevention programs. Methods A grounded theory study using face-to-face, recorded interviews was conducted with surviving self-immolated patients (n = 14), their close relatives (n = 5), and medical staff (n = 8) in Kermanshah, Iran. Data were analyzed using constant comparison in open, axial, and selective coding stages. Results A conceptual model was developed to explain the relationships among the main categories extracted through the grounded theory study. Family conflicts emerged as the core category. Cultural context of self-immolated patients offered a contextual condition. Other important categories linked to the core category were mental health problems, distinct characteristics of the suicidal method, and self-immolation as a threat. The role of mental health problems as a causal condition was detected in different levels of the self-immolation process. Finally, adverse consequences of self-immolation emerged as having important impact. Conclusion The conceptual model, derived through grounded theory study, can guide design of prevention programs. The pivotal role of family conflicts should be emphasized in mental health interventions. The impact of adverse consequences of self-immolation on further suicidal processes necessitates post-suicide prevention programs. Further research to design specific interventions is recommended.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khankeh, H. R., Hosseini, S. A., Rezaie, L., Shakeri, J., & Schwebel, D. C. (2015). A model to explain suicide by self-immolation among Iranian women: A grounded theory study. Burns, 41(7), 1562–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.03.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free