Keystroke Analysis: Reflections on Procedures and Measures

118Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although keystroke logging promises to provide a valuable tool for writing research, it can often be difficult to relate logs to underlying processes. This article describes the procedures and measures that the authors developed to analyze a sample of 80 keystroke logs, with a view to achieving a better alignment between keystroke-logging measures and underlying cognitive processes. They used these measures to analyze pauses, bursts, and revisions and found that (a) burst lengths vary depending on their initiation type as well as their termination type, suggesting that the classification system used in previous research should be elaborated; (b) mixture models fit pause duration data better than unimodal central tendency statistics; and (c) individuals who pause for longer at sentence boundaries produce shorter but more well-formed bursts. A principal components analysis identified three underlying dimensions in these data: planned text production, within-sentence revision, and revision of global text structure. © 2012 SAGE Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke Analysis: Reflections on Procedures and Measures. Written Communication, 29(3), 246–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free