Theories of Metaphor Revised. Against a Cognitive Theory of Metaphor: An Apology for Classical Metaphor

  • Kessler S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research that deals with metaphors and linguistic imagery has increased in the last thirty years. However, studies that question existing theories of metaphor from a comparative perspective are less common. The reason for the present theoretical sketch was the metaphorical model of conceptualism, alias the cognitive theory of metaphor: at least with this theory, `metaphor' itself has become a metaphor, and the classical, rhetorical metaphor has been sidelined. Kessler's book not only criticises existing theories of metaphor, but also develops from them a discursive synthesis that seeks to rehabilitate the classical metaphor as an everyday pragmalinguistic phenomenon. For this purpose, the nature of thought, the mental lexicon, predication and word semantics are also covered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kessler, S. (2018). Theories of Metaphor Revised. Against a Cognitive Theory of Metaphor: An Apology for Classical Metaphor. Theories of Metaphor Revised. Against a Cognitive Theory of Metaphor: An Apology for Classical Metaphor. Logos Verlag Berlin. https://doi.org/10.30819/4701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free