Balancing urban density, energy performance and environmental quality in the Mediterranean: A typological evaluation based on photovoltaic potential

21Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As research on the correlation between urban design and environmental performance is still lacking, the following long-standing question still stands - How far can we densify urban districts without sacrificing their energy balance and indoor environmental quality? This question served as the starting point for a parametric typological study conducted at the block scale in the context of Tel Aviv, with the overall aim of promoting performance driven design of Mediterranean urban environments. Dynamic input parameters included fenestration ratio, aspect ratios and floor area ratios of 5 different building typologies in both office and residential land uses. Environmental outputs included energy cooling loads, spatial daylight autonomy and the monthly average load match between energy demand and photovoltaic energy supply. The courtyard typology was found to achieve the best performance in terms of monthly Load Match, however mostly in residential uses of lower density. Although the high-rise typology offered the best daylight conditions, it recorded the worse performance in terms of energy balance and energy cooling demand. Results demonstrate the potential of a parametric typological workflow to effectively indicate the tradeoffs between single building and urban scale design considerations. This potential could be harnessed to assess the environmental feasibility of net zero energy typologies in Mediterranean climates and will be used for district energy studies as part of future work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Natanian, J., & Auer, T. (2018). Balancing urban density, energy performance and environmental quality in the Mediterranean: A typological evaluation based on photovoltaic potential. In Energy Procedia (Vol. 152, pp. 1103–1108). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free