Music Education and the Limbo of Unrealized Possibilities

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this introductory editorial, I explore whether music education has moved to a stance of moralism rather than one of ethical teaching and action. In this essay, I define morality as the principles that enable one to discern if something is right or wrong, good or bad; ethics guide an individual or group’s behavior or activity based on those principles.1 Therefore, any ethical action emerges from principles grounded in a moral belief. The questions posed in this editorial arise from a recent opinion article that called for “a less moralistic humanities.” What does this call mean, and how might it look in music education, a disci-pline classified within both the humanities and the social sciences? Following the discus-sion, I introduce the six articles in this issue of Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education. Each essay relates in some way to the question of “a less moralistic humani-ties,” for which the editorial introduction serves as a prompt for consideration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bradley, D. (2022). Music Education and the Limbo of Unrealized Possibilities. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22176/act21.1.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free