Ideal point modeling of non-cognitive constructs: Review and recommendations for research

16Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most psychological measurement models assume a monotonically increasing relation between the latent trait and the probability of responding. These models have historically been based on the measurement of abilities (e.g., cognitive), which have dominance properties. However, they are less appropriate for the measurement of non-cognitive constructs, or self-reported typical behaviors (e.g., attitudes, emotions, interests, personality), which have historically been assumed to have ideal point properties, or a nonmonotonic relation between the latent trait and the probability of responding. In this paper, we review the literature on ideal point modeling of non-cognitive constructs to present a theoretical framework that can help guide researchers on pertinent factors that may influence ideal point responding when assessing non-cognitive constructs. We also review the practical implications of not using ideal point response models for non-cognitive constructs and propose areas for research in non-cognitive construct assessment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2018). Ideal point modeling of non-cognitive constructs: Review and recommendations for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02423

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free