Incidence and risk factors for non-union of the superior ramus osteotomy when hip dysplasia is treated with periacetabular osteotomy

  • Sivamurugan G
  • Westermann R
  • Glass N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. Few studies report risk factors for the development of superior ramus osteotomy non-union. The purpose of this investigation was to document the incidence and risk factors for this complication. We identified 316 consecutive hips that underwent PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. We developed and validated a technique to measure the superior ramus osteotomy location on anterior-posterior (AP) pelvis radiographs and computed tomography. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate the relationships between odds of non-union and potential demographic and radiographic predictor variables in univariate and multivariate analyses. Twenty-nine (9.2%) hips developed superior ramus non-union. Age {median [interquartile range (IQR)] 23 years (18–35) healed versus 35 years (26–40) non-united, P = 0.001}, pre-operative lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) [16° (11–20) healed versus 10° (6–13) non-united, P < 0.001] and the distance from the superior ramus osteotomy to the ilioishial line [15.8 mm (13.2–18.7) healed versus 18.1 mm (16.2–20.5) non-united, P < 0.001] varied significantly between groups. Using multivariate analysis, moderate-to-severe dysplasia [LCEA < 15°, odds ratio (OR) 5.95, standard error (SE) 3.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.99–17.79, P = 0.001], increased age (5-year increase, OR 1.29, SE 3.32, 95% CI 1.105–1.60, P-value = 0.018) and distance from the ilioishial line (3-mm increase, OR 1.67, SE 0.22, 95% CI 1.29–2.18, P < 0.001) were at increased risk of developing non-union. Superior ramus osteotomy non-union is common after PAO. Older age, moderate-to-severe dysplasia, and more medial osteotomy location were independent risk factors for non-union. Consideration should be made in high-risk patients for a more lateral superior ramus osteotomy and adjuvant medical and surgical interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sivamurugan, G., Westermann, R. W., Glass, N., Davison, J. C., Miller, A., Henrichsen, J., … Willey, M. C. (2023). Incidence and risk factors for non-union of the superior ramus osteotomy when hip dysplasia is treated with periacetabular osteotomy. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery, 10(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free