District magnitude and representation of the majority's preferences-a reply and new perspectives

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We reply to the comment of John Carey and Simon Hix on our original contribution entitled "District Magnitude and Representation of the Majority's Preferences: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Popular and Parliamentary Votes" in Public Choice 151:585-610 (2012). District magnitude does not necessarily affect deviations between political representatives and their district voters in a strictly monotonic way but monotonicity is upheld for deviations between representatives and the national majority. We provide new perspectives and caution against evaluating electoral systems by focusing on individual politicians' behavior but neglecting aggregation effects. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Portmann, M., Stadelmann, D., & Eichenberger, R. (2013, January 1). District magnitude and representation of the majority’s preferences-a reply and new perspectives. Public Choice. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0038-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free