Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice

  • Dankasa J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

J. of infosci. theory and practice 3(3): 64-74, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.3.4 ABSTRACT Despite the number of developed theories, it still remains a difficult task for some established and emerging schol-ars in various academic fields to clearly articulate new theories from research studies. This paper reviews and col-lates the views of scholars on what a theory is and how a good theory can be developed. It explains the concept of a theory, and the different components that make up a theory. The paper discusses the different processes of theory development by emphasizing what theory is and what theory is not. This review found that scholars differ in their definition of a theory, which leads to using terms such as model, paradigm, framework, and theory inter-changeably. It found the lack of theoretical constructs in a study to be one of the factors which explains why arti-cles are rejected for publication. This paper may be of benefit to established researchers who may be struggling with theory development, and especially younger academics who are the future of scholarship in various academ-ic fields, particularly in information science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dankasa, J. (2015). Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(3), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1633/jistap.2015.3.3.4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free