Biological and psychosocial evidence in the Cass Review: a critical commentary

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In 2020, the UK’s National Health Services (NHS) commissioned an independent review to provide recommendations for the appropriate treatment for trans children and young people in its children’s gender services. This review, named the Cass Review, was published in 2024 and aimed to provide such recommendations based on, among other sources, the current available literature and an independent research program. Aim: This commentary seeks to investigate the robustness of the biological and psychosocial evidence the Review—and the independent research programme through it—provides for its recommendations. Results: Several issues with the scientific substantiation are highlighted, calling into question the robustness of the evidence the Review bases its claims on. Discussion: As a result, this also calls into question whether the Review is able to provide the evidence to substantiate its recommendations to deviate from the international standard of care for trans children and young people.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grijseels, D. M. (2024). Biological and psychosocial evidence in the Cass Review: a critical commentary. International Journal of Transgender Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2024.2362304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free