20 - Social Movements: Sequences vs Fuzzy Temporality

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drawing on dominant theoretical approaches from the interdisciplinary field of social movement studies, this chapter seeks a temporally sensitive account of social movement action. It begins by constructing a sequential view of movements that focuses on three phases: mobilization, interaction, and consequences. Following a critique of the sequential approach, it suggests new directions for the development of a more temporally sensitive understanding via the notions of velocity, vector, timescale, and timescape. Contentious politics, social movements, temporality, timescape, waves of protestKevin Gillan is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Manchester. He served as editor-in-chief of the journal Social Movement Studies from 2015 to 2019. His published work focuses primarily on the generation and communication of alternative ideas in movements opposing war and neoliberal capitalism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gillan, K. (2020). 20 - Social Movements: Sequences vs Fuzzy Temporality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory, Volume II: Contemporary Theories and Issues (pp. 407–432). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677452.021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free