Effect of plasma insulin level on myocardial blood flow and its mechanism of action

43Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Considerable evidence suggests that coronary endothelium regulates myocardial blood flow and metabolism by elaborating vasoactive substances. The physiologic signals mediating this process are uncertain. To test the hypothesis that the process is influenced by physiologic variation in local insulin concentration, we examined the effect of direct intracoronary insulin infusion on myocardial blood flow and oxidative substrate metabolism in 10 patients with coronary heart disease. Ten men (aged 51 to 68 years) who were fasting received a 60-minute intracoronary infusion of insulin at a rate (10 mU/min) sufficient to raise coronary venous plasma insulin from 12 ± 4 to 133 ± 17 mU/ml without increasing the systemic insulin level. Local coronary hyperinsulinemia increased coronary sinus blood flow in every subject, from 50 ± 4 to 61 ± 6 ml/min (p <0.01). Insulin also increased myocardial uptake of glucose (from 6 ± 1 to 17 ± 6 mmol/min) and lactate (from 8 ± 2 to 12 ± 5 mmol/min), resulting in ~30% increase in total oxidative substrate uptake, but without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption (7.0 ± 0.7 vs 7.1 ± 0.8 ml/min). Thus, physiologic elevation in the local plasma insulin concentration increases coronary blood flow in the absence of any increase in myocardial oxygen demand or consumption, suggesting a primary reduction in coronary tone, while simultaneously restraining the oxidation of imported substrates. These observations are consistent with insulin-mediated elaboration of vasoactive and/or paracrine factors within the coronary circulation. Copyright (C) 2000 Excerpta Medica Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McNulty, P. H., Pfau, S., & Deckelbaum, L. I. (2000). Effect of plasma insulin level on myocardial blood flow and its mechanism of action. American Journal of Cardiology, 85(2), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00650-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free