Maximal Resolution from the Ronchigram: Human vs. Deep Learning

  • Schnitzer N
  • Sung S
  • Hovden R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Real-space atomic-resolution imaging with aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has revolutionized material characterization. Maximizing resolution, contrast, and total usable beam current is critically dependent on the ability to determine the largest convergence angle (objective aperture) permitted by lens aberrations. However, this quantity is difficult to accurately measure in real charged particle optical systems. For STEM, the electron Ronchigram encodes the optimal convergence angle, but is challenging to quantifiably assess and currently is most accurately evaluated with human expertise [1]. Here we present a deep regression framework which predicts the optimal convergence angle for maximal probe quality and imaging resolution from a simulated Ronchigram. Our neural network operates 500 times faster with 6 times less error than trained microscopists and outperforms common heuristic algorithms that are unrealistically given perfect knowledge of the aberration function. The widely accepted criteria for selecting a convergence angle for STEM imaging is Rayleigh's quarter-wave rule, which promises good image quality for less than a quarter-wave of primary spherical aberration (χ

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schnitzer, N., Sung, S. H., & Hovden, R. (2019). Maximal Resolution from the Ronchigram: Human vs. Deep Learning. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 25(S2), 160–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927619001533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free