Intuition in Occupational Therapists’ Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to map the various facets of intuition in occupational therapy (OT), from its definitions, theoretical frameworks, epistemological paradigms to practical applications, highlighting its role in decision-making. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, a systematic search of five databases from 1990 to August 2023 identified 337 records related to OT and intuition. After removing duplicates and applying eligibility criteria, 22 studies were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the title/abstract and full-text screening. Thematic analysis synthesized descriptions of intuitive reasoning, and the studies’ epistemologies were interpreted based on stated methodologies and knowledge conceptions. Key themes depicted OT’s intuition as personalized knowledge developed through practice. Constructivist paradigms recognizing subjective meaning-making predominated (63.6%), while postpositivists related to self-reported intuition to decision outcomes quantitatively (22.7%). Despite increasing interdisciplinary attention, occupational therapists’ intuition remains understudied. Integrating analytical and intuitive practice through reflection is crucial for client-centered expertise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

P, V., P, L., E, M., & A, R. (2025). Intuition in Occupational Therapists’ Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review. OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 45(4), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241300604

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free