Work life of persons with asthma, rhinitis, and COPD: A study using a national, population-based sample

2Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the duration of work life among persons reporting a physician's diagnosis of COPD, asthma, or rhinitis compared to those with select non-respiratory conditions or none and to delineate the factors associated with continuance of employment. Methods: Persons ages 55 to 75 reporting a physician's diagnosis of COPD, asthma, or rhinitis as well as those without any of these conditions were identified by random-digit dialing (RDD) in the continental U.S and administered a structured survey. We used Kaplan-Meier life table analysis to estimate the duration of work life among persons with and without the three conditions and Cox proportional hazard regression to examine the role of demographic and work characteristics in the proportion leaving employment in each time interval. Results: Persons with COPD, asthma, and rhinitis were no less likely than the remainder of the population to have ever worked, but those with COPD were less likely to be working when interviewed or as of age 65, whichever came first. As of age 55, only 62 percent of persons with COPD continued to work versus 72 and 78 percent of persons with asthma and rhinitis, respectively. Persons with COPD, asthma, and rhinitis all had an elevated risk of leaving work prior to age 65 relative to those without chronic conditions, with and without adjustment for demographic and work characteristics. Conclusion: COPD and to a lesser extent asthma and rhinitis were associated with a substantially shortened work life, an effect not due to demographic and work characteristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yelin, E., Katz, P., Balmes, J., Trupin, L., Earnest, G., Eisner, M., & Blanc, P. (2007). Work life of persons with asthma, rhinitis, and COPD: A study using a national, population-based sample. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-2-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free