Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: An opinion

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Increasing the incidence of caesarean section is not in line with professional and deontological guidelines. Elective cesarean section prevents primordial prevention of chronic cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, imunological, endocrinological morbidity by peripartal programming. Elective non-medical indicated caesarean section is not a procedure that respects deontological, clinical etics, scientific and professional principles. It is like an unacceptable surgery outside the scope of medical ethics. Clientelism in high-risk clinical obstetric medicine is not a professional and deontologically correct category: A physician should not be a provider on request of healthy pregnant women with the potential to have a medically incorrect procedure and complications associated with it and to put a healthy pregnant/ maternity and child status in the patient's status. The financial, social, political and cultural components must not outweigh good clinical practice and the moral principles of medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habek, D., Prka, M., Cartolovni, A., Cerovac, A., & Dokozic, D. (2021, February 15). Caesarean section between doctrine to heresis. Medicoethical and deontological view of caesarology: An opinion. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology. IMR Press Limited. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog.2021.01.2305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free