V̇/Q̇ and alveolar gas exchange in pulmonary sarcoidosis

21Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Eleven patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis of type II or III were investigated with regard to regional distribution of ventilation and perfusion (V̇/Q̇), alveolar gas exchange and diffusion limit at rest and during exercise. Lung volumes were 50-65% of normal values. Flow-volume curves indicated obstructive changes. The transfer factor was 75% (range 16-120%) of predicted. Perfusion scintigraphy showed marked defects in 7 out of 11 patients. Radiospirometry showed matching ventilation and perfusion defects and washout of xenon was prolonged. There was a venous admixture at rest of 9%. Arterial oxygen tension (Pa02) averaged 9.7 kPa. V̇/Q̇ analyses indicated the presence of a small shunt (1%), regions with low V̇/Q̇ in 4 out of 11 patients, regions with high V̇/Q̇ in 5 out of 11 patients and increased wasted ventilation. At rest measured PaO2 was lower (0.6 kPa) than predicted from the V̇/Q̇ distribution. During mild supine exercise causing significant dyspnoea, pulmonary vascular resistance rose to abnormal values, 5.2 mmHg·l·-1min-1·m2 BSA. The venous admixture decreased to 5.4%. The shunt was unchanged, as was the perfusion of regions with low V̇/Q̇. The regions with abnormally high V̇/Q̇ disappeared. Measured PaO2 decreased to 9.1 kPa, while calculated PaO2 remained unchanged. Thus the P(A-a)O2 at rest (4.2 kPa) was 70% caused by shunt and V̇/Q̇ mismatch. During exercise alveolar-arterial pressure difference for oxygen measured P(A-a)O2 rose further to 5.1 kPa, while calculated P(A-a)O2 remained unchanged and was only 50% caused by shunt and V̇/Q̇ disturbances. The difference between calculated and measured PaO2 indicated significant diffusion limitation both at rest and during mild exercise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eklund, A., Broman, L., Broman, M., & Holmgren, A. (1989). V̇/Q̇ and alveolar gas exchange in pulmonary sarcoidosis. European Respiratory Journal, 2(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.93.02020135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free