Comparison of the clinical effect between the lower sternal incision and the left parasternal fourth intercostal incision in the transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To analyze the clinical effect of two different ways of minimally invasive transthoracic closure in children with ventricular septal defect (VSD). Methods: From January 2015 to July 2019, 294 children with VSD were enrolled in the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups – those who underwent VSD closure through the left sternal fourth intercostal incision (group A: n = 95) and the lower sternal incision (group B: n = 129). Results: The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring time, postoperative hospitalization time and complication rate in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation success rate, mechanical ventilation time and total hospitalization cost (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect through the left sternal fourth intercostal incision is feasible, safe, cosmetic, and worth popularizing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, J., Shangguan, W., Chen, L. W., & Liao, D. shan. (2021). Comparison of the clinical effect between the lower sternal incision and the left parasternal fourth intercostal incision in the transthoracic closure of ventricular septal defect. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01543-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free