The influence of pain-related beliefs on physical activity and health attitudes in patients with claudication: A pilot study

18Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examined how pain beliefs are related to symptom severity, expectations of risk/benefits, and baseline physical activity among claudicants. Eligible patients at the Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center were administered questionnaires that measured: fear-avoidance beliefs (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire [FABQ]), walking impairment, baseline physical activity, claudication type, and risk/benefit attitudes. Among 20 participants, the median age was 69 years (IQR: 66-75). In our efforts to understand how fear-avoidance beliefs influenced physical activity among people with claudication, we found that 12 out of 19 participants (63%) thought that the primary etiology of their pain was walking, while 18 (out of 20) (90%) people thought that walking would exacerbate their leg symptoms - suggesting that there was some confusion regarding the effects of walking on claudication. Those who expected that walking would benefit their symptoms more than surgery reported fewer fear-avoidance beliefs (p=0.01), but those who believed that walking would make their leg pain worse expected greater benefit from surgery (p=0.02). As symptom severity increased, fear-avoidance beliefs also increased (p=0.001). The association between symptom severity and fear-avoidance beliefs indicates that as pain or impairment increases, the likelihood of avoiding behaviors that are thought to cause pain might also increase. Accounting for pain-related beliefs when recommending physical activity for claudication should be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharath, S. E., Kougias, P., & Barshes, N. R. (2017). The influence of pain-related beliefs on physical activity and health attitudes in patients with claudication: A pilot study. Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom), 22(5), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X17709944

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free