Bone flap resorption following cranioplasty with autologous bone: Quantitative measurement of bone flap resorption and predictive factors

29Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively measure the degree of bone flap resorption (BFR) following autologous bone cranioplasty and to investigate factors associated with BFR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and subsequent autologous bone cranioplasty between April 2005 and October 2014. BFR was defined as: 1) decrement ratio ([the ratio of initial BF size/craniectomy size]–[the ratio of last BF/craniectomy size]) >0.1; and 2) bone flap thinning or geometrical irregularity of bone flap shape on computed tomographic scan or skull plain X-ray. The minimal interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty was one month and the minimal follow-up period was one year. Clinical factors were compared between the BFR and no-BFR groups. Results: The time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty was 175.7±258.2 days and the mean period of follow up was 1364±886.8 days. Among the 29 patients (mean age 48.1 years, male: female ratio 20: 9), BFR occurred in 8 patients (27.6%). In one patient, removal of the bone flap was carried out due to severe BFR. The overall rate of BFR was 0.10±0.11 over 3.7 years. Following univariate analysis, younger age (30.5±23.2 vs. 54.9±13.4) and longer follow-up period (2204.5±897.3 vs. 1044.1±655.1) were significantly associated with BFR (p=0.008 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: The degree of BFR following autologous bone cranioplasty was 2.7%/year and was associated with younger age and longer follow-up period.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. P., Kim, J. H., Kang, H. I., Kim, D. R., Moon, B. G., & Kim, J. S. (2017). Bone flap resorption following cranioplasty with autologous bone: Quantitative measurement of bone flap resorption and predictive factors. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 60(6), 749–754. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0203.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free