Perioperative emergency laparotomy pathway for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: A propensity score matched study

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency laparotomy (EL) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, often exceeding 10%. Thi s study eval uated the i mpact of the EMergency Laparotomy Audit (EMLA) interdisciplinary perioperative pathway on patient outcomes, hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) within a single centre. Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted from August 2020 to July 2023. The intervention team included specialist clinicians, hospital administrators and an in-hospital quality improvement team. Patients who underwent EL were divided into a pre-intervention control group (n=136) and a post-intervention group (n=293), and an 8-item bundle was implemented. Propensity scoring with a 1:1 matching method was utilised to reduce confounding and selection bias. The primary outcomes examined were LOS, hospitalis-ation costs and surgical morbidity, while secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and adherence to the intervention protocol. Results: The utilisation of the EMLA perioperative care bundle led to a significant reduction in surgical complications (34.8% to 20.6%, P<0.01), a decrease in LOS by 3.3 days (15.4 to 12.1 days, P=0.03) and lower hospitalisation costs (SGD 40,160 to 30,948, P=0.04). Compliance with key interventions also showed i mprovement. However, there was no difference in 30-day mortality. Conclusion: This study offers insights on how surgical units can implement systemic perioperative changes to improve outcomes for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lau, J. W. L., Baliga, J., Khan, F., Teo, Y. X., Yeo, J. M. J., Yeow, V. Z., … Iau, P. (2024). Perioperative emergency laparotomy pathway for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: A propensity score matched study. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 53(12), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024311

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free