Decolonial AI Alignment: Openness, Viśesa-Dharma, and Including Excluded Knowledges

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prior work has explicated the coloniality of artificial intelligence (AI) development and deployment through mechanisms such as extractivism, automation, sociological essentialism, surveillance, and containment. However, that work has not engaged much with alignment: teaching behaviors to a large language model (LLM) in line with desired values, and has not considered a mechanism that arises within that process: moral absolutism-a part of the coloniality of knowledge. Colonialism has a history of altering the beliefs and values of colonized peoples; in this paper, I argue that this history is recapitulated in current LLM alignment practices and technologies. Furthermore, I suggest that AI alignment be decolonialized using three forms of openness: openness of models, openness to society, and openness to excluded knowledges. This suggested approach to decolonial AI alignment uses ideas from the argumentative moral philosophical tradition of Hinduism, which has been described as an open-source religion. One concept used is viśes.a-dharma, or particular context-specific notions of right and wrong. At the end of the paper, I provide a suggested reference architecture to work toward the proposed framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varshney, K. R. (2024). Decolonial AI Alignment: Openness, Viśesa-Dharma, and Including Excluded Knowledges. In Proceedings of the 7th AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES 2024 (pp. 1467–1481). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free