Microsatellite instability and intratumoural heterogeneity in 100 right-sided sporadic colon carcinomas

53Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Microsateltite instability has been proposed as an alternative pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of immunohistochemistry as a new tool for highlighting mismatch repair deficiency and to compare the results with a PCR-based microsatellite assay. A total of 100 sporadic proximal colon adenocarcinomas were analysed. The expression of hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 proteins evaluated by immunohistochemistry was altered in 39% of the cancers, whereas microsatellite instability assessed by PCR was detected in 43%. There was discordance between the two methods in eight cases. After further analyses performed on other tumoural areas for these eight cases, total concordance between the two techniques was observed (Kappa=100%). Our results demonstrate that immunohistochemistry may be as efficient as microsatellite amplification in the detection of unstable phenotype provided that at least two samples of each carcinoma are screened, because of intratumoural heterogeneity. © 2002 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapusot, C., Martin, L., Bouvier, A. M., Bonithon-Kopp, C., Ecarnot-Laubriet, A., Rageot, D., … Piard, F. (2002). Microsatellite instability and intratumoural heterogeneity in 100 right-sided sporadic colon carcinomas. British Journal of Cancer, 87(4), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600474

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free