Big and tall soldiers are more likely to survive battle: A possible explanation for the 'returning soldier effect' on the secondary sex ratio

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is widely known that more boys are born during and immediately after wars, but there has not been any ultimate (evolutionary) explanation for this 'returning soldier effect'. Here, I suggest that the higher sex ratios during and immediately after wars might be a byproduct of the fact that taller soldiers are more likely to survive battle and that taller parents are more likely to have sons. METHODS: I analyze a large sample of British Army service records during World War I. RESULTS: Surviving soldiers were on average more than one inch (3.33 cm) taller than fallen soldiers. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative estimates suggest that the one-inch height advantage alone is more than twice as sufficient to account for all the excess boys born in the UK during and after World War I. While it remains unclear why taller soldiers are more likely to survive battle, I predict that the returning soldier effect will not happen in more recent and future wars. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanazawa, S. (2007). Big and tall soldiers are more likely to survive battle: A possible explanation for the “returning soldier effect” on the secondary sex ratio. Human Reproduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem239

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free