The APOSTLE project: Local group kinematic mass constraints and simulation candidate selection

192Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We use a large sample of isolated dark matter halo pairs drawn from cosmological N-body simulations to identify candidate systems whose kinematics match that of the Local Group (LG) of galaxies. We find, in agreement with the 'timing argument' and earlier work, that the separation and approach velocity of the Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31) galaxies favour a total mass for the pair of ~5 × 1012M⊙. A mass this large, however, is difficult to reconcile with the small relative tangential velocity of the pair, as well as with the small deceleration from the Hubble flow observed for the most distant LG members. Halo pairs that match these three criteria have average masses a factor of ~2 times smaller than suggested by the timing argument, but with large dispersion. Guided by these results, we have selected 12 halo pairs with total mass in the range 1.6-3.6 × 1012M⊙ for the APOSTLE project (A Project Of Simulating The Local Environment), a suite of hydrodynamical resimulations at various numerical resolution levels (reaching up to ~104M⊙ per gas particle) that use the subgrid physics developed for the EAGLE project. These simulations reproduce, by construction, the main kinematics of the MW-M31 pair, and produce satellite populations whose overall number, luminosities, and kinematics are in good agreement with observations of theMWand M31 companions. The APOSTLE candidate systems thus provide an excellent testbed to confront directly many of the predictions of the λ cold dark matter cosmology with observations of our local Universe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fattahi, A., Navarro, J. F., Sawala, T., Frenk, C. S., Oman, K. A., Crain, R. A., … Jenkins, A. (2016). The APOSTLE project: Local group kinematic mass constraints and simulation candidate selection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457(1), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2970

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free