Beyond chance? The persistence of performance in online poker

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A major issue in the widespread controversy about the legality of poker and the appropriate taxation of winnings is whether poker should be considered a game of skill or a game of chance. To inform this debate we present an analysis into the role of skill in the performance of online poker players, using a large database with hundreds of millions of player-hand observations from real money ring games at three different stakes levels. We find that players whose earlier profitability was in the top (bottom) deciles perform better (worse) and are substantially more likely to end up in the top (bottom) performance deciles of the following time period. Regression analyses of performance on historical performance and other skill-related proxies provide further evidence for persistence and predictability. Simulations point out that skill dominates chance when performance is measured over 1,500 or more hands of play.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Potter Van Loon, R. J. D., Van Den Assem, M. J., & Van Dolder, D. (2015). Beyond chance? The persistence of performance in online poker. PLoS ONE, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115479

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free