Beyond formal groups: Neighboring acts and watershed protection in Appalachia

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

© 2016, Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services. All rights reserved. This paper explores how watershed organizations in Appalachia have persisted in addressing water quality issues in areas with a history of coal mining. We identified two watershed groups that have taken responsibility for restoring local creeks that were previously highly degraded and sporadically managed. These watershed groups represent cases of self-organized commons governance in resource-rich, economically poor Appalachian communities. We describe the extent and characteristics of links between watershed group volunteers and watershed residents who are not group members. Through surveys, participant observation, and key-informant consultation, we found that neighbors – group members as well as non-group-members – supported the group’s function through informal neighboring acts. Past research has shown that local commons governance institutions benefit from being nested in supportive external structures. We found that the persistence and success of community watershed organizations depends on the informal participation of local residents, affirming the necessity of looking beyond formal, organized groups to understand the resources, expertise, and information needed to address complex water pollution at the watershed level. Our findings augment the concept of nestedness in commons governance to include that of a formal organization acting as a neighbor that exchanges informal neighboring acts with local residents. In this way, we extend the concept of neighboring to include interactions between individuals and a group operating in the same geographic area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lukacs, H., Ardoin, N. M., & Grubert, E. (2016). Beyond formal groups: Neighboring acts and watershed protection in Appalachia. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 878–901. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.578

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free