Comparison of Small Modular Reactor and Large Nuclear Reactor Fuel Cost

  • Pannier C
  • Skoda R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Small modular reactors (SMRs) offer simple, standardized, and safe modular designs for new nuc-lear reactor construction. They are factory built, requiring smaller initial capital investment and facilitating shorter construction times. SMRs also promise competitive economy when compared with the current reactor fleet. Construction cost of a majority of the projects, which are mostly in their design stages, is not publicly available, but variable costs can be determined from fuel enrichment, average burn-up, and plant thermal efficiency, which are public parameters for many near-term SMR projects. The fuel cost of electricity generation for selected SMRs and large reac-tors is simulated, including calculation of optimal tails assay in the uranium enrichment process. The results are compared between one another and with current generation large reactor designs providing a rough comparison of the long-term economics of a new nuclear reactor project. SMRs are predicted to have higher fuel costs than large reactors. Particularly, integral pressurized water reactors (iPWRs) are shown to have from 15% to 70% higher fuel costs than large light water reactors using 2014 nuclear fuels market data. Fuel cost sensitivities to reactor design parameters are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pannier, C. P., & Skoda, R. (2014). Comparison of Small Modular Reactor and Large Nuclear Reactor Fuel Cost. Energy and Power Engineering, 06(05), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2014.65009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free