Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit

12Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite important progress in measuring the safety of health care delivery in a variety of health care settings, a comprehensive set of metrics for benchmarking is still lacking, especially for patient outcomes. Even in high-risk settings where similar procedures are performed daily, such as hospital intensive care units (ICUs), these measures largely do not exist. Yet we cannot compare safety or quality across institutions or regions, nor can we track whether safety is improving over time. To a large extent, ICU outcome measures deemed valid, important, and preventable by clinicians are unavailable, and abstracting clinical data from the medical record is excessively burdensome. Even if a set of outcomes garnered consensus, ensuring adequate risk adjustment to facilitate fair comparisons across institutions presents another challenge. This study reports on a consensus process to build 5 outcome measures for broad use to evaluate the quality of ICU care and inform quality improvement efforts. © 2013 by the American College of Medical Quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinez, E. A., Donelan, K., Henneman, J. P., Berenholtz, S. M., Miralles, P. D., Krug, A. E., … Pronovost, P. J. (2014). Identifying Meaningful Outcome Measures for the Intensive Care Unit. American Journal of Medical Quality, 29(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860613491823

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free